Election Economics And The Distortion Of Indian Democracy
BY R.K.MISRA
The problem with political jokes is that they get
elected, or so goes an age old adage. But worse is, that they do so at
your cost.
The irony of election economics is not lost.
Colossal sums are spent in holding elections and the popular mandate is
subverted through the backdoor by ‘cheating’ political parties. Watch
Maharashtra-wards.
According to the Centre for Media Studies(CMS),a
not-for-profit research think -tank , a sum of Rs 55,000 to 60,000 crores
was spent in the Lok Sabha elections,2019. The report named “Poll Expenditure:
The 2019 Elections”, terms it as the most expensive ever anywhere, with an
estimated Rs 100 crore spent in each constituency which comes to about Rs 700
per vote. The BJP spent about 45 per cent of the total amount as against
just 20 per cent it had done in 1998.
The Congress, which had spent 40 per cent of the total expenditure in 2009 when
it was in power, spent between 15-20 per cent in 2019.The total spend in 1998
was Rs 9000 crores. The expenditure permitted by the Election Commission per
constituency per candidate in larger states is Rs 70 lakhs.
An analysis of the audit reports submitted by
political parties to the Election Commission of India brings out that 18
political parties including 7 national ones spent Rs 6500 crores on elections
between 2015 and 2020 and 52.3 per cent or Rs 3400 crores of this amount was
spent on publicity alone. BJP spent 56 per cent(over Rs 3600 crores) of the
total election outlay of the 18 parties and the Congress 21.41 per cent(over Rs
1400 crores),the two together accounting for 77 per cent of the total five year
poll spend. Of this amount the BJP spending on advertisement and publicity was
Rs 2000 crores and the Congress Rs 560 crores.
However the CMS study puts the total expenditure by
all political parties and their candidates in the 2018 state Assembly elections
to the five states of, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh ,Rajasthan, Telangana and
Mizoram at Rs 14,000 crores alone. “As the poll expenditure rises so will the
corruption in governance as well”, it’s chairman N. Bhaskara Rao is
quoted saying. And therein lies the rub for the law is skewed in favour of the
party in power at the Centre. This is quite simply because it has more central
agencies at its command to weaponize and subjugate the “ target “to its will
and against opposition parties.
Take the case of electoral bonds introduced by the
Narendra Modi- led BJP government in 2017 , ostensibly to bring about
transparency in electoral funding. According to the annual audit report
of the BJP submitted to the Election Commission of India(ECI),the party got Rs
210 crores in electoral bonds in 2017-18, which ,as per the Association For
Democratic Reforms(ADR) report released on February 9.2021 constituted nearly
95 per cent of all the electoral bonds purchased in the period in question.
For the Financial year 2018-19, BJP received Rs
1,450.89 crores and the Indian National Congress(INC) Rs 383.26 crores worth.
Thus for the two periods taken together, political parties received Rs 2760.20
crores from electoral bonds of which “ a whopping 60.17 per cent or
Rs 1660.89 crore of this was received by a single party which is the ruling
political party “, the report said.
It added that over 52 per cent of the total
income of the national parties and 53.83 per cent of the total income of
regional parties analysed by ADR for 2018-19 came from donations received
through electoral bonds. The ECI data for 2019-20 continues on the same
lines with BJP getting over 75 per cent of the total electoral bonds sold and
the Congress about 9 per cent of the total amount of Rs 3,435 crores. According
to a written reply in Parliament by union minister of state for finance, Pankaj
Chaudhary bonds worth Rs 9208.23 crores have been sold since 2018 when they
became effectively available of which Rs 9187.55 crores worth have been
encashed by political parties.
The then union finance minister Arun Jaitley is on
record articulating that one of the aims of the 2016 demonetisation was to curb
the use of black money in poll funding.” The invisible political funding
process needs cleaning”, he added. But if figures of the 2019
parliamentary polls are any indicator, the reverse seems to have happened with
the amount almost doublings(CMS findings). According to the study, there were
over 70 seats where the poll expenditure crossed Rs 40 crores.
While the Modi government came to power promising
greater transparency in election funding but the actual fact is that it is more
opaque now than ever before. Subsequent disclosures brought out that both
the Election Commission and the Reserve Bank of India had voiced their
reservations about the electoral bonds scheme but the objections were
over-ruled and the scheme was passed in the Lok Sabha as part of the
Finance Bill thus doing away with the need to get it passed by the Rajya
Sabha. The Opposition parties have been vocal on the issue terming it as
a back channel to black money induction in elections though most have
been beneficiaries of the scheme, even if to a lesser extent. Former union
minister P. Chidambaram had termed electoral bonds the ’biggest scam of the
decade” and pointed out that the donor who did not donate to the BJP will be
known to the party and if anyone would be completely in the dark it would be
the people of India.
A huffpost
expose on electoral bonds carried out in 2020 based on RTI sourced
document has brought out the
irregularities on how this controversial source of political financing was
given effect . Interestingly, nearly three years after an appeal was filed with
the Central Information Commission(CIC), the highest authority to adjudicate
RTI matters, last December came its dismissal. The appeal had sought disclosure
of reports submitted by the State bank of India(SBI) regarding sale and
encashment of electoral bonds in 2018 which were withheld by SBI on ground of
personal information held in fiduciary capacity. Noted Suresh Chandra,
Information Commissioner , there appears to be “no public interest” in further
prolonging the matter as there is no substance in the appeal calling for
intervention by the Commission.
Eminent citizens had in December last year written
to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court , R.V. Ramanna, seeking early listing
of some important cases, including the
one relating to electoral bonds, which remains pending for four years though
numerous elections have taken place in the interregnum.
NGO, Association for Democratic Reforms had
filed a PIL in 2017 on the alleged issue of corruption and subversion of
democracy through illicit and foreign funding of political parties and an
interim application before the West Bengal and Assam elections for a stay on
sale of electoral bonds but the same was denied by a bench headed by the
then chief justice of the apex court S.A.Bobde.
Meanwhile, a request for urgent hearing on the
matter before a Supreme court bench headed by Chief Justice
N.V.Ramanna by advocate Prashant Bhushan in April this year has
elicited an acknowledging response that the issue was critical and needed
an urgent hearing leading to hopes of early resolution .
Justice delayed is justice denied and every
poll has a’ price’ .
Comments
Post a Comment