Supreme' s Sagacity , Gujarat's Policing And Political Poker !

-

 

BY R.K. MISRA

Poisoned percepts betray their own patterns. More so when policing, like poker, degenerates into the continuation of politics by other means.

The Supreme Court of India, had harsh words for the Gujarat Police which should reverberate through the uniformed force countrywide. Quashing an FIR filed against Congress MP, Imran Pratapgarhi over his social media post with a poem “ Ae khoon Ke pyase baat suno ”,it ruled that the right of citizens to express themselves could not be trampled upon on” flimsy and fanciful” grounds. ”No offence is attracted” and police must understand the meaning of written and spoken words before registering a case in such matters, it noted.

 The Apex Court on March 28 said the fundamental right to free speech through poetry, theatre, stand-up comedy, and satire must be cherished. The cops had charged the Congress MP with inciting discord through his poem on “suffering injustice with love”.

The judgment came following an appeal filed by Pratapgarhi against the registration of a criminal case by the Gujarat Police under Section 196 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). “Seventy-five years into our Republic, we cannot be seen to be so shaky on our fundamentals that a mere recital of a poem, or for that matter, any form of art or entertainment, such as stand-up comedy, can be alleged to lead to animosity or hatred amongst different communities. Subscribing to such a view would stifle all legitimate expressions of view in the public domain, which is so fundamental to a free society,” a Bench of Justices A.S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan wrote in its verdict.

The Apex Court threw a protective halo around citizens who bear the brunt of  government- induced or police- orchestrated harassment for spoken or written words and to ensure a measure of artistic freedom. ”FIRs should not be lodged blindly in a mechanical manner”, the Bench ruled.

The top court said free speech was an integral part of a healthy and civilised society. A person’s views cannot be silenced merely because the majority does not like the sound of them. The law enforcement authorities and courts must employ the standards of reasonable, strong-minded, firm, and courageous minds, and not weak and vacillating ones who scent danger in every hostile point of view, before initiating criminal action against freedom of expression. ”The poems words (posted by the Congress MP) do not bring about or promote disharmony. It only tells the rulers of the reaction if the fight for rights is met with injustice”, the judgement noted.

Interestingly, the Gujarat Police had charged Pratapgarhi following a complaint by a clerk of an advocate who alleged that the poem by him on social media was offensive. The police moved fast invoking sections197 (prejudicial imputations against national unity),299 (intentional actions to provoke religious sentiments) and 302(Speaking words to hurt religious feelings) of the BNS. The Gujarat High Court declined to dismiss the FIR on January 17 and sought redressal from the Supreme Court. The answer from the Apex Court rings loud and clear and is an answer to many to come clean.

 If it was a ‘hurt’ citizen who sought redressal for a social media post from the Congress MP, it was a BJP leader in Gujarat who had been so hurt by a speech delivered by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi in Kolar Karnataka, that he filed a criminal defamation case in a Surat court in 2019.The Court convicted Gandhi to two years of imprisonment on March 23, 2023, but suspended his sentence, granted bail and allowed him to appeal to the High Court. The Lok Sabha secretariat moved with lightning speed, and next day a notification was issued informing all concerned including the Election Commission of India. Gandhi moved the High Court which on July 7,2023 refused to stay the conviction stating that he had breached ’modesty’ and his actions displayed ’moral turpitude’ besides him being a habitual offender.

Gandhi knocked the doors of the Supreme Court which ruled on August 4, 2023 that Rahul Gandhi’s criminal defamation conviction and sentencing was unjustified. “The three judge bench held that the two year jail term was excessive and devoid of reason. It was appalled by the lack of reasoning for such a strict sentence.

Earlier on April 20, 2022, Gujarat legislator Jignesh Mevani who was part of the Congress grouping was arrested from Palanpur circuit house in Gujarat by the Assam Police for a purported tweet against Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He was granted bail by a local court in Assam but before hearing could begin, Mevani was picked up in other cases and re-arrested by the Assam Police. He was subsequently bailed out again.

The pattern is discernable. For all practical purposes, Gujarat seems to be a happy hunting ground for ‘honourable gentlemen’ in BJP ruled states whose sentiments are ‘hurt’, to vent their spleen against ‘targeted’ Opposition leaders. And the cops are too busy playing second fiddle to their political masters for any impartial evaluation. That the Apex court has to teach them the nuances of hindi literature alongside plain policing is a sad augury on the prevailing state of affairs.

Meanwhile, a nation pre-occupied by ancient history and its religious sub-divisions of all makes and sorts, has sought momentary distraction in stand-up comic Kunal Kamra in a shift of scene to Maharashtra. Kamra is in the dock for his comments on Maharashtra deputy chief minister Eknath Shinde, with FIRs piling up against him. The Habitat studio in Mumbai, a hub for stand-up comedy has been vandalised by Shiv Sainiks and has indefinitely downed the shutters. The Sainiks are all, off course , out on bail. Kamra, a resident of Tamil Nadu has been granted interim protection from arrest by the Tamil Nadu High Court with a notice to the Khar police in Mumbai returnable by April 7. 

It is now the turn of stand-up comics to be put under notice. “Out of bound for all comic comments”, reads the unwritten notice !  

This syndicated news column was published in the Indian newspapers Orissapost and Lokmat Times editions dated  April1,, 2025  . Their links are given below:-

https://odishapostepaper.com/edition/5271/orissapost

https://epaper.lokmat.com/articlepage.php?articleid=LOKTIME_NALT_20250401_6_3

https://mediamap.co.in/blog/SCJudgementReflectsBroaderConcernforFreedomofExpression#


 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When The Fear Of Death Died !

-
  BY R.K. MISRA Uss gali meein kuch hua, iss khabar se mar gaye ! Aur phir kuch log, marjane ke darr se marr gaye !! So says an eminent Urdu poet . He speaks of the phantom fallacy of a panic-stricken mentality when the mere news of happenings across the street caused some to die while others perished, felled by just the fear of dying. Cancer kills but the fear of cancer kills faster. Walk into a cancer care clinic and a miasma of despair hangs heavy. Emotions spread taunt on stressed faces, giveaway creases on knitted brows, and an anxious demeanor vainly dodging doomsday prophecies is plastered all over.   Unlike the star reporters of today, the journalism of yore frowned on the faintest attempt at putting self before news. The story spoke and the byline bore the burden. This once, a     sliver of liberty would be in order for I am both the subject and the object of this engagement having faced the diagnosis and fought the disease over the last one year. ...
Read more

Hindu Antecedent Of Muslim Jinnah

-
Image
BY R.K.MISRA Nearly 70 years after his death, Muhammed Ali Jinnah’s portraits continue to adorn places like Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), Bombay High Court and Sabarmati Ashram in India. On the other hand, the Karachi Chamber of Commerce and Industry building’s foundation stone states that it was laid by Mahatma Gandhi in 1934. Recently, BJP MP Satish Gautam sought to remove a Jinnah portrait from AMU. It was ironic because, instead of vilifying Jinnah, the Modi Government should have actually decorated the  Qaid-e-Azam , posthumously, with a Bharat Ratna because, it was Jinnah who created a Hindu-majority Bharat from the rarefied, nebulous India, while pushing the Islamists to a corner of the subcontinent and that was why the Deoband School opposed Jinnah! Had India remained undivided, its Muslim population would now have been around 600 million, vis-à-vis the Hindus’ 1,000 million. Would the Hindus have lived peacefully with this l...
Read more

The Indian Medicine 'Mixopathy'

-
    BY R.K. MISRA   Blending ideas and inspiration works wonders. Mixing memory and desire stirs imagination but    coupling Allopathy and Ayurveda can be painfully punishing. In plain terms it is like fusing chalk with cheese. If the country’s medical fraternity has been in ferment at the Narendra Modi- led BJP government’s pre-occupation with ‘mixopathy’, Gujarat went through a tense last week after the health department of the state government called a meeting to discuss ‘practice of Allopathy by those who have studied Ayurveda’. ‘Mixopathy’ is a loosely coined term used to describe the integration of alternative medicine systems, such as Ayurveda, with modern medical science which is also called Allopathy. The term is a combination of the words "mix" and "pathy", which means disease. The turmoil began after the Health Department of the Gujarat government issued a latter on December 27 calling for a meeting of senior officials and representa...
Read more