Bad Precedents & Totalitarian Temptations !
BY
R.K. MISRA
A
loophole in the law is like a bee in the political bonnet. A plug and play passion
manifests when chasing power, and a stomp and strangle obsession when securely
seated.
A
politician in power is a designer who learns to dress a loophole before a law
is clothed. Even loopholes big enough to drive trucks through. The journey of
the Lokpal law in India and the Lokayukta Act in Gujarat is a case in point.
However,
what drew immediate attention to the extent of the malaise infesting the
political woodwork was a recent report in a national daily that the Lokpal, in
the five years of its functioning, has ordered investigation in just 24 cases
and granted sanction for prosecution in six only. The rejection rate of
complaints, over this period of time stands at around 90 per cent and largely
for not being in the correct format.
Has
India gone magically corruption-free under the Narendra Modi-led BJP
government? The government in August 2021 told Parliament that the falling
figures of complaints received by the Lokpal (1427 in 2019-20,110 in 2020-21)
was proof that there was little to complain about against the present
government. The answer though lies elsewhere.
According
to Transparency International, India ranked 93 out of 180 countries on the
corruption perceptions index for 2023.The index calibrates on a scale of 0 to
100 with the former denoting very corrupt and the latter very clean. Data
apart, the average citizen dealing with the nuts and bolts of the system from
the cop on the road to the ‘patwari’ in the village and the ‘babu’ in the Secretariat
has bitter tales of palm-greasing to say. The higher you go, the larger the
stakes. Changes in governing parties have made little difference on the ground.
India’s
first ombudsman which is provisioned to probe allegations of corruption against
former and serving Prime Ministers, union cabinet ministers, members of
parliament, public and civil servants alike had been long in the works.
The
Lokpal and Lokayukta Bill,1968 was first introduced in the fourth Lok Sabha
when Mrs Indira Gandhi was the Prime Minister and nine times thereafter
including twice in 2011 but fell through. The Lokpal Act was finally passed in
2013 during the tenure of the Congress-led UPA. It came into force from January
16, 2014.
The
passage of the Bill was a sequence to a protracted agitation on an
anti-corruption platform led by Anna Hazare. The setting up of an overriding
constitutional authority (Lokpal) became the converging focal point of the
stir. It is common knowledge that the BJP and even the RSS had pooled the might
of its cadre to provide support to it. In fact, the perceptions created by this
agitation played no small a role in catapulting a Narendra Modi -led BJP
government to power at the Centre in 2014.
As
subsequent sequence of events point out, once in power the new government,
apparently, seemed in no hurry to appoint a Lokpal despite the admonitions of
the Supreme Court of India.
Lawyer-activist
Prashant Bhushan who played a major role in relentlessly pushing for judicial
intervention is on record that the present government did not want to have any
kind of anti-corruption ombudsman but were finally forced by the Supreme Court
to appoint a Lokpal. Interestingly, two former Gujarat cadre IAS officers
figure as members, I.P.Gautam who has completed his term and Pankaj Kumar,
still a member.
Interestingly, though
the Lokpal Act was passed in 2013, the country’s first Lokpal,
Justice P. C. Ghosh, was appointed over five years later only on March 19,
2019, along with eight other members. Justice Ghosh completed his tenure in May
2022 but his replacement Justice A.M.Khanwilkar,a retired judge of the Supreme
Court was appointed almost 22 months later to succeed him as the second Lokpal
in March 2024. All along there seemed to be no hurry in filling up a post that
had seen a nationwide upsurge with the then opposition- and now the party in
power- an intrinsic part of it!
It was a template that had
been cast earlier. Gujarat was without a Lokayukta for almost a decade during
Modi’s tenure as chief minister. Though the appointing body was headed by the
chief justice of the High Court, the appointment failed to materialise until
Governor Kamala Beniwal finally chose retired Justice R.A.Mehta for the job.
The Modi government
promptly knocked the doors of the judiciary but kept losing right up to the
Supreme Court. It even sought to change the entire process of appointment of
the Lokayukta and had a Bill passed in the Vidhan Sabha which gave the chief
minister primacy of place in the appointment of a person who was empowered to
probe him. The effort floundered at the altar of the Governor who rejected it
in 2013. Even the curative petition seeking a review of the apex court order
seeking chief minister’s say in the appointment of Lokayukta was dismissed by a
five member bench. Though the judiciary, at the highest level upheld the
appointment, retired Justice Mehta declined to take up the post citing the plea
that it had got mired in too much controversy.
All bad precedents begin
with justifiable measures and end in totalitarian temptations.
This syndicated news column was
published in the Orissapost and Lokmat Times newspaper editions dated January 28 and 30 , 2025 respectively. Their links
are given below:-
https://odishapostepaper.com/edition/5202/orissapost/page/8
https://epaper.lokmat.com/articlepage.php?articleid=LOKTIME_NALT_20250130_6_2
.
.
Comments
Post a Comment