Haren Pandya : The Slain BJP Politician Who Refuses To ' Die '
BY
R.K.MISRA
Ghosts
from the past have an uncanny way of turning up in the present with immense
potential to blight the future of the most powerful.
On
November 3, a key witness in the Sohrabuddin Sheikh alleged fake encounter case
told a Mumbai court that the murder of senior BJP leader and a former Gujarat
minister Haren Pandya in 2003 was a contract killing executed at the behest of
former IPS officer D.G.Vanzara.
The deposition of
Azam Khan, an Udaipur based small time gangster before the CBI court has
brought to life the most speculated and worst-kept secret of the time-- that
the murder of the up and coming Gujarat
BJP leader was a political extermination at the behest of some of the most
powerful in the land of the Mahatma.
Vanzara terms it as yet another conspiracy to
defame him. ”Azam Khan is a criminal. There are cases against him in Gujarat,
Rajasthan and some other states. Even today he is in jail. Moreover his
evidence is hearsay. It does not account for much under the Indian Evidence Act
and is not admissible under law. Moreover when CBI recorded his statement, he
did not say any such thing”.
Khan,
though, had said during further
cross-examination, that he had told the CBI officer, N.S.Raju about the contract killing but it was not
taken on record on the pretext of not creating new complications.
The
revelation about Pandya’s killings
surfaced in the course of the proceedings in the Sohrabuddin Sheikh
alleged fake killing case in 2005, in which Vanzara was an accused with the then Minister of state for Home, Amit
Shah and IPS officers Raj Kumar Pandiyan and Dinesh MN. They have all been
discharged from the case along with other police officers such as N.K.Amin and Vipul Aggarwal, to name a few.
According to one count, 90 of the total witnesses examined in the case so far
have turned hostile. In short, the big guns are free, while lower rank officers and constabulary are
facing the music.
Though
fake encounters by cops have taken place earlier, these acquired a pattern
during Narendra Modi’s stint as Gujarat
chief minister. These encounters included those of Sadiq Jamal (2003), Ishrat Jahan and two others (2004),Sohrabuddin
and his wife Kauser Bi (2005) and Tulsiram Prajapati (2006). Almost all of them
were labelled as handles of Pakistani terror agencies out to get the CM.
Most of the time, the senior cop
unravelling these conspiracies was led by Vanzara. Interestingly 32 police officers including six IPS officers were incarcerated in
connection with a series of police encounters in Gujarat.
According
to a published report, during an
interrogation by a CBI team of Vanzara led by DIG Sandeep Tamagde in Sabarmati jail in September 2013, he had hinted
at a political conspiracy behind Pandya’s killing. He also reportedly spoke
of Sohrabuddin’s role in Pandya’s murder in March 2003. His
interrogation took place after he had written an explosive letter resigning
from the IPS in which he reportedly
blamed Shah for the encounters.
What transpired within the CBI after Vanzara’s
interrogation is not known but the fact remains that Azam Khan’s revelation echoed what the accused IPS
officer had hinted in 2013 -that Pandya’ killing was political.
Haren’s
father, Vithal Pandya also termed his son’s death as a political conspiracy
orchestrated by Vanzara at the behest of the then chief minister.The octogenarian,
who passed away in January 2011, went down fighting. He did not agree with
CBI’s line of investigation and was
livid with then union Home Minister L.K.
Advani for blaming ISI and underworld don Dawood Ibrahim, days before CBI took over the probe. ”It was Advani who
set the line of investigations for CBI and derailed the probe”, Vithal said. He
added that his constituency, Ellisbridge in Ahmedabad, had remained peaceful
even during the 2002 riots that followed the Godhra train carnage..
Haren
Pandya ,was a rising star in the BJP in Gujarat and was immensely popular
within the party. He held the home
portfolio in the Keshubhai Patel government and revenue in the first Modi
government..The first point of friction between the two was Modi’s choice
of Pandya’a Ellisbridge seat to enter the Vidhan Sabha and Pandya’s
refusal to oblige. Modi was subsequently
elected to the Assembly from Rajkot, on a seat vacated by Vajubhai Vala, the
present Governor of Karnataka.
In
the immediate aftermath of the Godhra train carnage, Pandya is reported to have
opposed bringing the burnt body remnants of the passengers by road from Godhra
to Ahmedabad ,at a cabinet meeting. He
said it would further ignite communal passions ,but he was shouted down. What followed is history
.Though kept confidential, it is known that Pandya had testified before the
Concerned Citizens Tribunal on the 2002 Gujarat riots. It comprised of three
retired judicial luminaries.That Pandya was a marked man thereafter was known. He
had also expressed fears of his likely
liquidation to chosen contacts in the media as well.
Vithal
Pandya never tired of pointing to the political conspiracy that led to his
son’s killing. He did not even agree with the POTA court judgment on June 25, 2007
that sentenced nine people to life imprisonment for the murder of Haren.If he
had been alive, the old man would have felt vindicated on August 29, 2011 when the Gujarat High Court reversed the lower
court’s order terming it “perverse” and “illegal” and which did not consider scientific
evidence presented in the injuries , forensic
and ballistic reports. It criticized the CBI
for a “botched” and ” blinkered” investigation and said that the
investigating officers” ought to be held accountable for their ineptitude,
resulting in injustice, harassment of many people concerned, enormous waste of
public resources and public time of court”.
It
is against this backdrop that one needs to view Azam Khan’s testimony purely in
relation to Haren Pandya’s case even though it links the fake encounters with
it ,particularly the Sohrabuddin Sheikh and Tulsiram Prajapati cases.
According
to Azam’s testimony “during a discussion
with Sohrabuddin, he told me he along with Naeem Khan and shahid rampuri got
the contract to kill Haren Pandya and they killed him. I felt sad and I told
Sohrabuddin that they have killed a good person. Sohrabuddin told me that the
contract to him was given by Vanzara. Khan
also testified in court that Sohrabuddin had told him that this work had come from above.
Haren
Pandya’s body was found in his
Maruti-800 riddled with seven bullets,with the windows rolled up except for the
driver’s side.There was no blood in the car except a tiny solitary drop on the
adjoining seat. One does’nt need an expert to tell you that he had possibly
been abducted, killed elsewhere and the
body put back in his car which was kept at the venue of his morning walk .
The
investigating agencies, the Gujarat police initially and the CBI soon after ,apparently
seemed more intent in covering up than in exposing the real killers.
The
last has not been heard in the matter though the fate of Haren Pandya and many other encounters have inextricably got linked to a political
see-saw.
Comments
Post a Comment